The World’s Largest Wind Turbine Has Been Switched On::It’s turbo time.

  • backslashhh@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    just one of these turbines should be able to produce enough electricity to power 36,000 households of three people each for one year.

    per year? per lifetime? per second?

  • Wilshire@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    50,000 square meters (nearly 540,000 square feet)

    That’s approximately 3 square Walmarts

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    According to the corporation, just one of these turbines should be able to produce enough electricity to power 36,000 households of three people each for one year.

    These types of statements always trip me up. Why one year? If it’s producing that amount of energy in that same year, shouldn’t it just be “…power 36,000 households of three people.”?

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re leaving out an important part of the claim.

      I can set up some piezoelectric things in my office chair such that when I sit my fat ass down it generates a small electrical charge. I can say that my ass can generate enough electricity to power a million homes for 10 years, assuming I don’t tell you how long it takes to generate that power, which would be on the order of decades, if not centuries, if not longer.

      I’d wager someone saw the average energy output for the expected service lifetime of the turbine, then was like, “How much energy does one 3-person household use?” and started playing with Excel until they got a good mix of time and # of households for the press release.