Pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel activists claim targeting Zionists isn’t antisemitic because not all Jews identify as Zionists; new policy shows school disagrees, given that most Jews do
In July, Meta banned the use of “Zionist” as a cover for attacks on Jews or Israelis on its platforms. Now, NYU, which like many universities became embroiled in pro-Palestinian unrest during the last school year year, appears to be the first college to take a stance on the term’s use.
Free speech? That’s Hamas.
Zionist is not a protected class which is good because they’re all horrible people devoid of human empathy that deserve to be spat on.
Spot on. They have a sect called Chabad where you can’t touch, acknowledge or even talk to the women. If that’s not right wing shit baggery idk what is.
If you have ever been to Passover with a Zionist, you know how bad they are. Literally the worst people.
They are like Minnesota nice, all smiles in the front but a knife behind their back.
But per the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which has been widely adopted (and here), anti-Zionism is antisemitic. Why do you hate Jewish people?
-
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
-
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
-
Times of Israel - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Times of Israel:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Israel
Wikipedia about this sourceA newspaper in a territory with mandatory military censorship, which regularly publishes military lies as fact without additional verification, but sure “left center” and “high” credibility.
It is an owner-class media bias fact checker.
Thanks for pointing that out!
The mods apparently like that every post here is marred by this useless bot
