His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Taxi? I mean, I guess? If I was a taxi driver and a bunch of people from the Westboro Baptist Church tried to get into my cab, I’d speed off for sure.

    Teacher? Hmm. Well, they can try. But, humorously, it’s just like a “conservative” to deny a child an education. It’s all about the kids right? Trash.

    Doctor? No. They are governed by rules that prevent that.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ok, so let’s hope that the supreme court agrees with you and draws the line at taxi drivers. Because today they let photographers discriminate you and tomorrow they can decide that the rules for doctors are unconstitutional.

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do you really want a doctor treat you who despises you? Can you still trust them to do their best?

        The real problem lies deeper than this.

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          So where you live doctors just let people suffer/die if they don’t like them and it’s ok? You don’t have any oversight, expert panels, ethics boards, investigations? That’s wild.

    • mx_smith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it depends if you are a contractor or an employee. A contractor like a cab driver or photographer sure they can refuse clients, but a teacher and Dr are both employees of a school district and insurance company who have a public image to uphold.