When it comes to age on the ballot, Texas didn’t wait until 2024 to weigh in.

Asked to let judges stay on the bench until they’re 79 years old — a year younger than President Joe Biden — Texas voters soundly rejected the proposal in Tuesday’s elections, a defeat that drew new attention to issues of age and fitness for office in the U.S.

“Age is front of mind for American voters in a way that it has not traditionally been and they are nervous about it,” said Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University.

Others cautioned against broader takeaways. At least four other states have rejected similar proposals over the last decade, according to the National Center for State Courts. And states that have passed the measures have mostly done so in close votes.

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll counter with the example of Bernie Sanders, who is 82 years old, still sharp as a tack, and arguably the furthest left person in the federal government. Jimmy Carter is 99 years old, and while I know we’re not hearing much from him anymore, he’s been an incredible force for good well into his nineties. (Yes, I know he hasn’t held elected office since early 1981, but he damned well could have, and done it well.)

    Yes, Feinstein should have retired a very long time ago, not because of her age, but because of her mental decline.

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t make policy based on outliers.

        The way to avoid that, and to respect individual differences, is with standardized periodic testing, which I would support for sure.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes. Every time, 100%, yes.

              You shouldnt be in power at that age. Your body is either failing, beginning fail, or could fail within minutes.

              Lets even set aside the massive mental degredation, of which the outliers are few and far far far between. Hows your heart? Your liver? Your thyroid? How many politicians have to have sneaky hidden surgeries and procedures to hide their failing bodies from the public? (Spoiler, its a lot)

              These people are supposed to lead nations. Thats like trusting the lead sled dog pulling life saving supplies across the tundras of the north to the 20 year old husky who is missing an eye and a hind leg.

              This isnt even about disabilities. You cannot out-fit the passage of time. Your body cant out juke aging. And we know the human limits are sputtering out by that point regardless of your natural levels of ability.

              They. Dont. Need. That. Power. They need to retire, care for their health, and enjoy their final years. They dont need to hoard power like some pathetic sniveling dragon guarding a pile of gold.

              The only reason we dont have that no brainer limit already is because the walking mummies arent willing to give up their thrones. Because they crave power. Which is proof they do not deserve it, and need to go.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How do you establish competency when the people you are measuring are the people putting the test on, grading it, choosing its metrics, and who define competency as “the thing Im doing right now, thank you very much”?

                  Youre arguing for a vapid ideal that relies on politicians to not be politicians while they appraise themselves and one another.

                  You basically want to give them a political cudgel to weaponize against political enemies because the concept gives you the warm and fuzzies.

                  • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    How do you establish competency when the people you are measuring are the people putting the test on, grading it, choosing its metrics, and who define competency as “the thing Im doing right now, thank you very much”?

                    So we don’t have ANYONE under your arbitrary line with enough experience and power to set such competency standards? No one at all?

                    Youre arguing for a vapid

                    On second thought, fuck you.