• zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The key word here is “capping”. People are assuming for some reason that an estate tax means the repo man comes and takes all your earthly possessions after you die or something, but no one’s suggesting that. They’re suggesting putting a cap on how much you can pass down in an inheritance, as a way to prevent the hoarding of wealth by a single person/family.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If necessary for the inheritor to meet their tax obligations, sure. I’m sure there’s a dozen different estate tax systems in place that tax professionals would know more about, but yes, liquidating assets would be one way for an interior to meet their tax obligations.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What would another way be? Say I inherited my parents company they built, entirely privately owned.

              • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You would be charged a tax proportional to the value of that business. How you pay it is up to you. This is how estate tax is currently done in the US at the Federal level. Again, I’m not a tax professional, so if you want to know more I’d suggest looking into it yourself.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That would essentially mean family businesses, at least past a certain size, would be impossible. Or more realistically, they would just obfuscate the ownership structure.