Do you need a domain name if you are hosting a Lemmy instance, or will it work fine with just an ip-address + port (e.g. <username>@<ip-address>:<port>)?

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It requires an HTTPS connection, and certificates can only be obtained for domain names. So yes, pretty much.

    Also consider than IPs can change, even if you’re using a hosting provider. Domain names makes changing the IP much easier.

    Domain names can be obtained for as cheap as $3/year for the xyz TLD. If you can’t pay for anything, there’s also free services that can let you get a subdomain, like noip.com, afraid.org, azote.org.

    • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason being that federation means other instances send you things. It’s not pull-only, or else you could likely get away with private instances sitting behind NAT. But since activitypub involves publishing to inboxes from source to destination, they need some way to reach you. And since we want to validate that connection and that some external authority can vouch for ita ownership, we use TLS Certs with the DNS hostname that matches your server name.

    • idle@158436977.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also if you dont mind numbers .xyz domains can be like $1 a year. It has to be only numbers and i think at least 9 digits.

      • happy_saw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry but do you mean that .xyz domains only allow for a numbers only domain name? Because I don’t think that’s true.

        • idle@158436977.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No i mean if you want a super cheap .xyz domain, its very cheap if you choose a domain that is digits only. For example my lemmy domain is 158436977.xyz. its 89 cents a year.

          You can certainly have xyz domains that are words just like any other.

          • gun/linux@latte.isnot.coffee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What name registrar would you recommend?

            EDIT: found one for 0.85 dollars on namecheap

            EDIT EDIT: for some reason its labeled as a “premium domain” :P

            • idle@158436977.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Namecheap is what I use ya. They are also really great if you have some internal services and want just a cheap domain to get SSL certs from LetEncrypt. All my internal traffic is SSL now because why not, its 85 cents a year. And no dealing with self-signed certs.

  • Brendan McKenzie@lemmy.bmck.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t dug into the protocol, but I’d imagine communication would be done over HTTPS, which requires a domain.

  • Matt@netmonkey.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t imagine it’d work without a domain, as your instance will need to talk HTTPS with other instances.

      • fuser@quex.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, I just learned something, but what does “control” the IP mean? If they are only validating a single address via http then presumably you could just use an Amazon elastic IP as long as it resolves. I doubt that letsencrypt will support that but I would be interested to know. If they do then yeah, you could presumably set up the instance using the IP as the name, but I don’t know why you would want to. Apart from the fact that it would be hard to remember, could change at some point, screwing things up, it might work. I suggest OP do the necessary and report back accordingly.

        • godless@latte.isnot.coffee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          but what does “control” the IP mean

          I believe that means you must be registered as the owner with the RIPE or whichever authority is in charge of administrating IP ranges, so that would also negate the point of chaining IP addresses, since that would indeed be a permanent fixture.

          For AWS it should then only work if Amazon Inc. is the applicant for the SSL cert., not merely a user. So it’s a quite theoretical application at best.

          • fuser@quex.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            yes, there had to be catch, although the guy in this letsencrypt support thread is a senior Letsencrypt engineer and he seems to be saying it is possible - although letsencrypt doesn’t support it. I do think you’d have to show a bit more to the issuer to prove ownership than an http acme challenge though.

            • Sergey Kozharinov@lem.serkozh.me
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              It doesn’t make a lot of sense for LetsEncrypt to spend time adding support for such certs, since both a domain name and a cert from another CA are cheaper than buying an IPv4 block