• smooth_tea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    They asked for a study. You give a bare url to an abstract with the quote

    Perhaps you could download the entire meta study that is linked next to the abstract and go through it? And why does it matter whether I’m agreeing with the post?

    From all the years of reading about artificial sugar studies, it’s clear to me that there could be a risk but it is complex and varies from person to person, I find it misplaced to shout that there is absolutely no risk involved. To quote the study:

    Result of this review largely agree with those of other recent systematic reviews, in that replacing sugars with NSS in the short term results in reductions in body weight, with little impact on other cardiometabolic risk factors, but is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and mortality in the longer term.

    • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Perhaps you could download the entire meta study that is linked next to the abstract and go through it?

      No, I am not refereeing a paper because some commenter links it in a web forum. Why would you think that’s even close to what anyone should do in this environment?

      • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So let me get this straight, someone asks for a study, I provide the study of studies, which you misjudge originally for being only an abstract, and then when I correct you and tell you it’s a study, suddenly it’s not good enough. What do you actually want?