China has secured a virtual monopoly over gallium, a critical mineral used to produce microchips in advanced military technologies. Failing to de-risk gallium supply chains could have serious security and economic consequences for the United States and its allies.
Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.
There is no actual point to counter. You’re evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can’t believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.
I’m constantly questioning myself. That’s why it’s so easy for me to discredit your propaganda.
You might want to read the articles connected to some of those headlines you frantically copy and paste, and then look for corroborating verified articles from a different source. Yhen, come to your own conclusion that cannot be refuted according to the data you’ve gathered(stop making unverifiable claims that are so easily refuted is a good first step), and you might actually be able to make a coherent post!
Ah yes, CSIS, a famous Chinese propaganda outlet. 😂
Ah yes, purporting an argument for another since you can’t counter their actual point.
There is no actual point to counter. You’re evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can’t believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.
Whatever your reason for doubting CSIS is, dont attributed to me. You have plenty on your plate as it is without making up claims by others.
I’m not the one doubting CSIS who made the report that China’s gallium restriction are a national security threat to US.
Well, if you read reports from more than one country, you might not blindly believe every headline you specifically search for.
Really should take your own advice there.
I’m constantly questioning myself. That’s why it’s so easy for me to discredit your propaganda.
You might want to read the articles connected to some of those headlines you frantically copy and paste, and then look for corroborating verified articles from a different source. Yhen, come to your own conclusion that cannot be refuted according to the data you’ve gathered(stop making unverifiable claims that are so easily refuted is a good first step), and you might actually be able to make a coherent post!
If you think that making glib comments full of personal attacks is what discrediting means then you’re about as smart as I thought you were.