Leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months ago‘There is no such thing as a real picture’: Samsung defends AI photo editing on Galaxy S24www.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1298arrow-down114cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1284arrow-down1external-link‘There is no such thing as a real picture’: Samsung defends AI photo editing on Galaxy S24www.techradar.comLeo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square116fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squaregapbetweenus@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·edit-25 months agoI don’t really understand what is unethical about AI photo edit to begin with? Like photo editing before AI existed and you could make anything you want with a ps.
minus-squarepinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoBecause it’s not automatic and is outside of the user’s control, to start.
minus-squaredatavoid@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoBesides potential copyright infringement, there isn’t really any issue with it I’d say. This is still an incredibly stupid take from Samsung however.
I don’t really understand what is unethical about AI photo edit to begin with? Like photo editing before AI existed and you could make anything you want with a ps.
Because it’s not automatic and is outside of the user’s control, to start.
It’s not?
Besides potential copyright infringement, there isn’t really any issue with it I’d say. This is still an incredibly stupid take from Samsung however.