Surprising no one but the mgmt teams…

Unispace found that nearly half (42%) of companies with return-to-office mandates witnessed a higher level of employee attrition than they had anticipated. And almost a third (29%) of companies enforcing office returns are struggling with recruitment. In other words, employers knew the mandates would cause some attrition, but they weren’t ready for the serious problems that would result.

Meanwhile, a staggering 76% of employees stand ready to jump ship if their companies decide to pull the plug on flexible work schedules, according to the Greenhouse report. Moreover, employees from historically underrepresented groups are 22% more likely to consider other options if flexibility comes to an end.

In the SHED survey, the gravity of this situation becomes more evident. The survey equates the displeasure of shifting from a flexible work model to a traditional one to that of experiencing a 2% to 3% pay cut.

  • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who contributed to the ‘high level of attrition’ during a forced return to office: it was my pleasure and I’ll do it again.

  • Branny@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    With around 15 years of experience working remote-only, I will never accept a job that mandates a day in the office.

    If the role isn’t 100% remote, it is not considered.

    Simple as that.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s awesome being at a permanent remote startup that’s hiring right now, we get the cream of the crop that is leaving those other companies right now.

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Return to office is such a fucking joke. I’m not spending hours in the car to keep corporate leases and McDonald’s afloat.

  • Pulptastic@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many companies, including my previous one, assume their position is stronger than it is. Then they complain and blame millennials’ work ethic when people don’t hang around for their torture like they used to.

  • neomis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    My wife and I left our company when they clawed us back to the office. It’s been 3 years now and there is 0 chance we’ll go back at this point. For all the big companies complaining about their empty buildings there are medium size players happy to poach top talent and let them work remote

  • Arotrios@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yep, you can’t fight basic math.

    With a half-hour commute, you’re dropping at least $250/mo on gas (more if you use proper mileage calculations and include car insurance costs) and spending an additional 32 hours of your time in unpaid travel for work. If your hourly rate is $15/hr, that means another potential $380 in earnings a month out the door.

    Since that $15/hr brings you in $2600 before taxes, that means in this scenario you’re spending roughly 10% of your gross income on travel expenses, and losing out on a potential income increase of 14%.

    This is why, despite the fact they were a great company I had thought about joining for years, last year I turned down an offer that was a 50% raise from my previously held position.

    I got the same amount in an offer from a separate company that enabled work from home, and when I did the math, the value between the two was striking - it was the clear winner, despite the fact that the first company only wanted me to travel across town.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think this is even the full picture, though. The cost savings from working remotely for me have been largely unnoticed (but objectively there).

      The real value, for me, has been increased autonomy and freedom from the office culture and overbearing bosses. It was amazing how my managers were suddenly ambivalent about my work performance once they weren’t able to constantly observe me at my desk.

  • NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In the SHED survey, the gravity of this situation becomes more evident. The survey equates the displeasure of shifting from a flexible work model to a traditional one to that of experiencing a 2% to 3% pay cut.

    Those number seem way too low to me. Just picking some semi-random numbers, let’s assume a 40 hour work week and an average travel time to work and back of 1 hour per day, so 5 hours per week. Being forced to come to the office would then be equivalent to 12.5% more of your time spent to earn the same amount of money. Of course that scales depending on how far away from the workplace you live, but for 3% or 2% to be realistic you would basically have to live right next door.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use 25% (or 5% per day required in office premium). I assume an hour commute. Usually its less but it tends to be close enough. Its a bit of an over estimation but that all is easily covered by things like walking the dog at lunchtime and eating cheaper and healthier. Along with seeing my wife even if I don’t have time to talk there is something about just being around. Oh and using my own bathroom with my prefered bath tissue. No catching other peoples kids crud. Man the list goes on and on.

    • penguin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People aren’t that logical. Most people feel more pain losing something than never getting it in the first place (eg: rolling back an accidental raise would be worse to someone than not getting the raise at all)

      If you tell people to get back to work or lose 3% pay, you’ll get more takers than offering people a 3% bump. Although they’ll be very disgruntled of course.

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      WFH saves me ~$4000 per year in gas & wear & tear alone. 4 cyl sedan with a 30 mile round trip.

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think this is funny, there are a ton of jobs and careers out there that you cannot do remotely. Or, at least the remote aspect suffers.

    Every time I read these threads 90% of the posters who are advocating for WFH are programmers who have $25k to drop on a nice shiny home office, and no need to ever interact with another human. Try WFH with a baby for 12 months and you’ll want to jump off of a bridge.

    • jackofalltrades@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am on my second child since starting working from home… Never been more productive, never been less stressed out…

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, bit why shouldn’t jobs that can be done at home be done there even if other jobs can’t? Seems like a very crabs in a bucket mentality.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well like they say, all the workers need is a nice little recession to return to the office. They’re getting too uppity!

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, since we like money more than control, my company is letting the office lease expire & finding a smaller, cheaper place for our equipment.