• Synestine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the top of my head, compared to ext4: RAM use and the ability to shrink an FS if necessary. Oh, also I’ve used an EXT FS driver on a Windows host, but I’ve never seen one for XFS.

    • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just to clarify, the previous comment asked about benefits of XFS over ext4. But I completely agree with your reasons for choosing ext4.

      • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, my bad.

        The two benefits to XFS that I’ve ever seen are that it has no inode limit like ext4 (which prevents the FS shrink). The other is that it seems to handle simultaneous I/O better than ext4 does; think very active database volumes and datastores.