• garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know I’m not the only one who has been saying that this type of move makes perfect sense for governments and news organizations, but I’m going to go ahead and take credit for this.

    You’re welcome, guys!

  • LakesLem@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I may be misremembering but seem to recall them being early to Tw*tter too. Good sign

  • pqdinfo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Removed as a protest against the community’s support for campaigns to bring about the deaths of members of marginalized groups, and opposition to private entities working to prevent such campaigns, together with it’s mindless flaming and downvoting of anyone who disagrees.

  • ren (a they/them)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This makes so much sense.

    BBC wouldn’t make their news site under Google Blogger… so why depend on other corporations for your microblogging?

    Spin up your own server, have your own verification, then use it on your site and share outs.

  • HipPriest@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a fan of the BBC, they make a lot of terrific programmes and the breadth of the audience their radio stations cater to is pretty phenomenal.

    They also have a history of experimenting with technology so it’s not a total surprise they’ve taken this step. Since most people on Mastodon are either sharing British news sources from the BBC or The Guardian anyway it will be interesting to see how they fare…

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s wrong with government-run instances, when they’re used specifically for communication from that government?

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a smart thing for news sources and ngos to do - run an instance and use it to issue posts and provide a platform for journalists. Twitter and other platforms can still receive posts but the “source of truth” is the Mastodon server

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As much as I distrust these big corps, we need them to join the fediverse if we want this place to grow proper. I do worry over the possibility of them trying to monetize the platforms though.

    • HipPriest@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as big corps go I think the BBC is probably one of the safest in terms of worries about monetisation. I’m not saying they’re perfect but it’s very different to if it was Sky or another commercial channel.