Not much to add here, given the opening dependent clause.

    • Hubi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      But the opposing candidate was depicted as a crying soyjak and my candidate was the nordic gamer chad! How could I not vote for him?!

    • NoLifeKing@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean a free hotdog would change the mind of a shit load of people… So its not exactly hard…

    • FIash Mob #5678@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      99% of voters are pretty dumb.

      They’ve voted for the same broken promises going on 40 years now, and we’re looking at an election featuring two failed presidents, one of whom has been impeached multiple times AND tried to steal an election. Neither of these candidates seems capable of forming coherent sentences either.

      The only people winning here are people invested in the stock market.

      • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Using 40 years as the yardstick, we’re pretty much at the logical end of Reagan’s policies of union-busting, deregulation and upward redistribution of wealth through “tax cuts for the middle class.” Main difference is people now view an 8% mortgage as usury.