The author may be a right-wing fellow. Nonetheless, the data he exposes are taken from official Mozilla docs.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ad hominem applies to arguments. The source of an argument does not affect the soundness of that argument.

      But it’s not a fallacy to question an overarching narrative based on the source. If a person keeps selectively choosing facts and twisting words to forward a specific narrative, it’s not fallacious to view what that person says with skepticism.

      Edit: Typo. Also changed “valid” to “sound”.

      • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        ad hominem: in a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

        If you think his narrative is skewed and based on selectively chosen facts and twisted words, you could correct that.

        • darq@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And other people are doing that in the comments. I addressed your point about ad-hominem specifically. So your response is kinda irrelevant to what I wrote.

          People are questioning the narrative the author is painting based on their motivations. That’s different to ad-hominem.

        • stillwater@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You really want to take the position that narratives can’t be skewed by the overall ethos of the author?