The 6% commission, a standard in home purchase transactions, is no more.
In a sweeping move expected to reduce the cost of buying and selling a home, the National Association of Realtors announced Friday a settlement with groups of homesellers, agreeing to end landmark antitrust lawsuits by paying $418 million in damages and eliminating rules on commissions.
The NAR, which represents more than 1 million Realtors, also agreed to put in place a set of new rules. One prevents sellers’ brokers from setting buyers’ agents’ compensation, which critics say led brokers to push more expensive properties on customers. Another ends requirements that brokers subscribe to multiple listing services — many of which are owned by NAR subsidiaries — where homes are given a wide viewing in a local market. Another new rule will require buyers’ brokers to enter into written agreements with their buyers.
The agreement effectively will destroy the current homebuying and selling business model, in which sellers pay both their broker and a buyer’s broker, which critics say have driven housing prices artificially higher.
It is not and never was…
This is nothing but a blatant lie.
This author is a moron.
E: thanks for the downvotes dumbasses. The article has been edited and the relevant statements removed. Waiting for literally any of the downvoters to provide evidence to the contrary…
E2: in case anyone actually wants the real story, the only major change I can see after reading the settlement factsheet is that buyer agent commissions are no longer going to be advertised in the MLS, starting “mid-July 2024”.
I’ve never paid more than 3% on my home sales in Austin. Put simply, the market was too hot. I said “I’m not paying more than 3% total” to which most independent Realtors I interviewed said that.they would not do it because it would impact the showings. So I went to the top Realtor in the city and they agreed. All they did was list it on MLS and on their website. The longest sale took less than a month with the shortest being under contract before it was even listed. They just called one of their clients and it was gone in less than two hours.
6% for essentially zero effort is bullshit.
PS: You can list your home for sale on MLS yourself. There are plenty of services that do it for a fixed fee.
All of this is true.
deleted by creator
I honestly don’t understand. The best understanding that I can come up with is that buyers “felt” like they couldn’t negotiate with their buyers’ agent, even though they totally could.
It’s also been said that NAR requires sellers to provide some sort of compensation to buyers, but I’ve never seen this officially documented anywhere either.
What I know with absolute certainty is that I work in the field and I’ve taken <6% on many occasions, and even <1% on the buyer’s side. If I work a buy/sell deal I don’t even ask for 6%, I just write 5% in. And no one gives a shit. My broker doesn’t like it but I’m the one writing the agreements.
Broker also requires 3% on buyers side but that’s nothing to do with NAR. And the buyer is totally free to negotiate that with their agent upon completing a representation agreement, which is required.
deleted by creator
How are we both right when what you quoted says commission is negotiable and the article says NAR requires 6%?
deleted by creator
Thanks for editing your comment
I’ve already addressed this. This is another lie I’ve heard several times, and no one who has claimed this has ever provided documentation of such policies. I have looked thoroughly myself.
That’s because they would. Whose fault is that?