Former Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines was among more than a dozen college athletes who filed a lawsuit against the NCAA on Thursday, accusing it of violating their Title IX rights by allowing transgender woman Lia Thomas to compete at the national championships in 2022.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Atlanta, details the shock Gaines and other swimmers felt when they learned they would have to share a locker room with Thomas at the championships in Atlanta. It documents a number of races they swam in with Thomas, including the 200-yard final in which Thomas and Gaines tied for fifth but Thomas, not Gaines, was handed the fifth-place trophy.

Thomas swam for Pennsylvania. She competed for the men’s team at Penn before her gender transition.

Thomas was the first openly transgender athlete to win a Division I title in any sport, finishing in front of three Olympic medalists for the championship. By not making the final, the lawsuit mentions that Florida swimmer Tylor Mathieu, who was not a plaintiff, was denied first-team All-American honors in that event.

Other plaintiffs included athletes from volleyball and track.

  • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    First of all, the person in question was in their 20’s at the time. She is 25 now and it happened 2 years ago.

    Secondly, I never said to alienate anyone. Give the women that are uncomfortable their own locker room.

    I do not see the issue here.

    The only place would not be allowed is that locker room and that does not affect her in any meaningful way.

    Yes, she has to deal with the fact that those people are uncomfortable around her, but that is just part of life.

    Let’s try this another way, if the way to make the problem go away is just to allow someone else to have another locker room and not share it, why shouldn’t we do that with how easy it is?

    • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I buy that if it’s not a “trans locker” but a “TERF locker”. Women that don’t have a problem can go to the “normal” women locker.

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s what I keep saying, everyone wants to take it the wrong way.

        I even said the people with a problem could just use the men’s locker room.

        If that is a problem then they can just go in shifts. There are so many easy ways to let these people isolate themselves if they are uncomfortable or bigoted.

        Either way everyone wins.

    • Cogency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because it’s insisting on a distinction when there is none. Anatomy doesn’t make the woman dude.

      • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You keep looking at this like I have ever said that.

        Here are the simple facts: you have one person who makes some of the group uncomfortable changing around them, you give the group that is uncomfortable, their own changing area.

        Why they are uncomfortable does not matter at all maybe it could be just because they don’t want to change around a different competitor. I really don’t give a shit. There’s an easy solution.

        Would we be having this issue if it was a group that didn’t want to change around certain competitors for any other reason?

        Maybe they’re from nationalities that clash next time, the same solution works.

        Maybe it’s just redheads that do not want to change around people with blue eyes.

        You already have two locker rooms, and room and the women’s room have the ones that are uncomfortable use the men’s room there’s not gonna be anyone in there anyway

        • Cogency@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s a whole lot of words to use to say just to say use the men’s room and the answer is no. We are women we’re entitled to be with women. We need the same or more protection from men that other women do.

          • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            My suggestion was that the people with the problem can use the men’s locker room since it is already built.

            Everyone without a problem can use the women’s.

            If the people with a problem are uncomfortable being isolated then oh fucking well.

            Either they are truly uncomfortable in which case they can be comfortable now, or they are bigots that are self isolating.

            Fucking win win

            • Cogency@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Learn to put proper antecedents in if you don’t want to be misunderstood.

              “These ones do, the problem could be solved easily enough with separate locker rooms.”

              That could just have been as left vague as you could word it to both insult while maintaining plausible deniability that you didn’t intend to insult.

              • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                You already have two locker rooms, and room and the women’s room have the ones that are uncomfortable use the men’s room there’s not gonna be anyone in there anyway.

                I feel like that is very clear

                • Cogency@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  It wasn’t in the pertinent message when you could be misconstrued. You only clarified your position after you started getting downvotes

                  • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Also, I’m on kbin I can’t see Lemmy downvotes so idk what they are at.

                    Feel free to sign up on a cabin account and check.

                    We don’t do anonymous down votes here, or up votes for that matter