The first hearing went well actually, South Africa’s claims were found to have merit.
Israel was ordered to minimise the suffering it’s causing, but obviously Israel has not done so and as long as the US shields them from the UN nothing much else can be done about it.
The UN has reported on Israels war crimes, this is documented and known factual information.
They heard all about it in the Hague. How did that judgement go again?
The first hearing went well actually, South Africa’s claims were found to have merit.
Israel was ordered to minimise the suffering it’s causing, but obviously Israel has not done so and as long as the US shields them from the UN nothing much else can be done about it.
The fact finding found no war crimes. But, the court acknowledged there was potential and it should be monitored.