• xradeon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Honestly I expect, just like in the early days of personal computing, that Gen Z and beyond will suffer from PC illiteracy. The main issue is that phones and tablets are being used almost exclusively during school and on personal time, so they have no idea what Windows nor even Mac looks and feels like. What happens with Zoomer gets an office job for the first time? They have to figure out how to use Windows and Office for the first time. It’s crazy to think that your 70 yr old Grandma and your 17 yr old Nephew could potentially be on the same level of knowledge of how to use Windows, Office, etc…

    • Mellibird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s insane how true this is. I’ve actually worked with some kids that have no idea how to use windows, let alone know how to type. It’s so odd, and almost disorienting at times, to experience this from both those older than me (parents, etc) and those younger than me.

      • justgohomealready@lemmy.pt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve taught a basic web programming class to 17/18 year old’s. Hardly anyone had ever heard of file extensions (windows by default doesn’t show them anymore), and most of them didn’t understand the concept of folders and files, at all. I was shocked.

        I spent 4 hours with them before the whole class was able to create a “index.html” file inside a specific folder, it was like teaching old people. I now feel a lot safer in my programming job.

      • Kleinbonum@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’ve had conversations with young people who started work in an office environment that required a lot of text editing/text creation, and they didn’t know how to type on a keyboard.

        On a physical keyboard on their work computer, they used a kind of two finger search-and-type system.

        Their opinion was that typing on a physical keyboard was an outdated skill that just wasn’t required any more.

        I asked them if they used voice-to-text or some other input method instead, and they said no.

        Are that point, I just talked away, because I didn’t have any polite follow-up questions, and we simply didn’t seem to speak the same language.

        • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I wonder if in the future people will use their smartphone as an input decive for desktop PCs. If they really can’t be bothered to learn how to use a proper keyboard, that could maybe still be a lot faster than typing with your index fingers.

          • Kleinbonum@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, I get that, and hypothetically you could just use a mobile device for text creation, using your preferred method of inputting text (e.g. a swipe keyboard, or a stylus with text recognition, etc.) on the mobile device and then send it all to the desktop.

            I asked about that, and I didn’t get a definitive answer. The conversation was more like:

            “You don’t get it, we grew up with touchscreen devices, physical keyboards are outdated.”

            “So do you use voice to text or something?”

            “No! You don’t get it. We grew up with mobile devices!

            “But… How do you enter text!?”

            “Nobody cares about your typewriting skills!!”

            They stared at me.

            I stared back.

            The generational gap felt like the Grand Canyon.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I work in a job where a lot of student aged people need to send me evidence to get a tax discount, and they are so bad at just attaching a document to an email.

      Half of them I get are photos of the documents rather than scans, the ones using iPhones let their phone compress the image to the point it’s unreadable and the android users send me a drive link I can’t access as I don’t have a Google account logged in at work.

      None of them seem to be able to scan a document as a pdf and attacging it directly to an email.

      • mayooooo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Just wanted to say that - young people don’t grok files and folders, it’s hard for me to understand how they manage

        • professed@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Indeed! I teach an introductory web design class for undergraduates and despite my best efforts it takes a lot of students the whole semester to figure out file paths. If I had more time in the term, I think I’d dedicate a unit to it, just to get everyone up to speed — and I may have to do it anyway. In fairness to the kids, even Mac and Windows machines these days do a lot to minimize users’ exposure to file structures in the name of usability. Meanwhile, the phones and school Chromebooks they’ve grown up using completely obfuscate this information.

          • mayooooo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I wish you luck with that class, and I expect the students get the other stuff - I have colleagues with masters degrees who aren’t really sure how stuff works outside of the downloads folder

        • Helix@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          that’s not a defense, there are countless scanning apps for phones and tablets which magically correct the perspective and distortion and remove the creases. In a way, these are even better than scanners because they have a very high resolution.