• rms1990@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People make this argument and barely anyone really uses the waterprooding features of a phone

    • Someology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You know, I really like my Essential Ph-1. It was a lovely little phone. I had the little 360 camera accessory that snapped on magentically and everything. It was so cool! Then, 1.5 seconds, dropped into water from which I grabbed it instantly, and it was done. No warranty coverage for dropping it in water, and zero waterproofing, and toasted phone. So, yes, more of us “use” waterproofing on our phones than you would think. The thing is that it didn’t need to be this way. There were waterproof phones back before everything was glued glass slabs all the time. Galaxy S5 Sport as mentioned by @HubbleST@lemm.ee above (and other “sport” edition phones). We have a lot of hygrophobic coatings and tech we didn’t have in the day of the Galaxy S5 series. We can do better now, if manufacturers are forced to.

    • AmberPrince@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Water proofing is for more than just taking it underwater though. It’s also for getting caught in the rain, leaving it on a bathroom counter while you shower, or accidentally dropping it in a puddle.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My cheap not-waterproof phone survives mild rain just fine, as does being in the bathroom while I shower, or being in my pocket under very heavy rain.

        Waterproof means it can be submerged, but most technology meant for daily use have a fair bit of resilence baked in…