Fellow climbers say video footage shows Kristin Harila’s team walking over body of frostbitten man during record ascent

  • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought it was common practice to leave them because a rescue attempt would usually kill everyone involved. You either come prepared to go all the way up and all the way down, or you stay on the mountain.

    • ahornsirup@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which just highlights how exploitative the whole endeavour is. Rich Westerners hire poor locals to risk their lives for no good reason beyond clout. These aren’t scientific expeditions, there’s no actual value in them.

      • ikiru@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, all of these ‘hikes’ should be banned. It’s absurd.

        Of course, people will claim that these hikes provide jobs and a healthy economy for people who would otherwise not have work but it just once again shows how these hikers are exploiting desperate people who are literally willing to die for a job.

        • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you. It’s not like most of these trips are creating any advancements. People are dying so that other people can see a view and brag about it. What a terrible return for a human life.

          I’m all for saving lives and looking out for eachother. That being said, many of these expeditions come with a dumb expectation that random people should also be willing to die. You shouldn’t be able to intentionally do things for fun that you know will likely risk other people’s lives. Many kids have lost their parents because of this.

          I kind of doubt that the people who live there really feel like they have a way out at this point. Even if they found a way to be financially stable outside of this industry, I feel like a large amount of very selfish people would be angry that they couldn’t go on these trips with the natives anymore. How could they stop people from showing up?

          Maybe people shouldn’t be going on a mountain that’s known to be deadly if they know that they will absolutley need to rely on a guide to survive. Maybe people should be working their way up mountain difficulty, and not just starting at the extreme ones. People should also start to respect the danger of being on a fucking mountain.

          So many of these deaths would have been avoided if these expeditions weren’t a thing. If people can’t do this safely without continuously risking the lives of others, we should seriously look into stopping it. So many families are permanently missing loved ones because of this industry.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, come on now. In the worst year, Everest claimed 11 lives.

          In the United States of America, on average, 22 people die from COWS.

          Extreme sports, like mountain climbing, are dangerous, but not nearly as deadly as fishing (drownings).

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t agree with op’s opinion or yours, but you are really misusing statistics.

            Way more people are exposed to cows and fishing than to Mount Everest, orders of magnitude more.

            Or do you think a fisherman should perform comparable preparation to someone climbing to 8k meters?

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fishermen, yes, should be trained and pass a swimming test before heading on the water. These are preventable deaths with very easy solutions to prevent them.

              And yes, fair enough that there are more people fishing than mountain climbing, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that it causes more deaths than any other sport. Nobody is asking for fishing to be banned because it’s too dangerous.

              As for cow exposure, more people are exposed to dogs, like orders of magnitude more, yet cows still kill more people. So mere exposure doesn’t paint a full picture.

              People climbing mountains know that they might not make it back. It’s a risk, just like scuba diving, skiing, mountain biking, surfing, or any other hundreds of things we do for sport, fitness, and entertainment.

              Someone shouldn’t say that mounting climbing should be banned for only a few deaths here and there, when you have literally any other sport causing more harm.

              Statistically speaking, mountain climbing is likely safer than driving to the mountain. 😂

              • ikiru@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Honestly, I wouldn’t care if these hikers themselves died en masse trying to go up Everest or whichever mountain alone. Let them keep doing it. It’s like those people who jump or fall into the Grand Canyon—I don’t think there should be barriers, if they are dumb enough to get too close and fall in then, in the words of Jerry Seinfeld, that’s a shame. My concern is their exploiting people who are far poorer than them to accompany them on this unnecessary journey, which they may not even want to do, only to sometimes perish.

                If fishermen die while doing a hobby, that’s a tragedy but they chose to participate in it. But if they had paid some poor individual to help them in a dangerous fishing situation, at a lake or something, and this was a common practice because people with more resources wouldn’t take such an unnecessarily risky job, then I would also say fishing at that location should just be banned. Not because of the fishermen who do it willingly, but because of the poor they exploit in the process and who die for their enjoyment or enrichment. And even if the fishermen were doing it for their own job, that would also be tragic and maybe people shouldn’t fish in such a location if it were dangerous, but at least they didn’t die for an entirely and totally pointless job.

                Getting fish for others to eat is a valuable and meaningful job, shepherding vainglorious Europeans and Americans with a deathwish for no real reason is not a job worth dying for, in my opinion. But it just shows how these expeditions exploit the global poor to death for just the simple pleasures of the relatively wealthy.

                • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But it just shows how these expeditions exploit the global poor to death for just the simple pleasures of the relatively wealthy.

                  Can’t this be said of pretty much any tourist attraction in an underdeveloped country? Even guided expeditions (on land or by water) can be dangerous to the guide. Heck, even in North America you have tours of glaciers, which can be quite dangerous. We just call it regular work, not exploitation.

                  Just a few years ago, several people died on one of these tours..

                  I also think it’s unfair to paint these people as rich snobs just out to fulfill some “unnecessary journey”. Life is about adventure, and some people do more than just walk around their own neighbourhood trails.

                  But this is all in the realm of subjectivity, and I don’t think there’s a right or wrong side to this argument.

              • BFrizzleFoShizzle@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Someone shouldn’t say that mounting climbing should be banned for only a few deaths here and there, when you have literally any other sport causing more harm.

                I’m all for keeping mountain climbing legal, but I don’t think the logic behind this holds up.

                Russian Roulette has a far higher rate of death in participants than fishing, but probably results in less yearly deaths. By this logic, Russian Roulette should be legal because it causes less overall harm.

                Applying the same logic to your animal example - I found a study saying tigers kill on average 1-2 people in the US per year, less than 1/10th the number killed by cows. Does that mean people should be allowed to own tigers?

                • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Russian Roulette has a far higher rate of death in participants than fishing, but probably results in less yearly deaths. By this logic, Russian Roulette should be legal because it causes less overall harm.

                  Are you saying that something designed to have a fatal outcome is comparable to something that does not, yet still results in a tremendous number of preventable death? Because that seems like a straw man.

                  Applying the same logic to your animal example - I found a study saying tigers kill on average 1-2 people in the US per year, less than 1/10th the number killed by cows. Does that mean people should be allowed to own tigers?

                  Well… tigers are banned for a different reason, so that logic can’t be applied. But let’s take dogs, bully breeds… some places DO ban them because of how dangerous they are, even though cows kill more people.

                  But in the context of sport, people who understand and consent to the risks they pose to themselves should be permitted to do it. If not, then nearly every sport would be banned on the basis of them being too dangerous. Heck, cheerleading causes something like 20,000+ injuries a year. LOL

          • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s a bit misleading to compare total numbers instead of percentages. The most people to ever summit Everest in one year was 800 in 2018, and an average of 4.4 deaths occur per year to do it.

            That’s 0.55% mortality for this one mountain.

            If you apply the same odds to any other sport they would probably be banned. Could you imagine if 9 NFL players died every year? It’s roughly less than 1 per year at the moment I believe and that’s still pretty bad.

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a bit misleading to compare total numbers instead of percentages. The most people to ever summit Everest in one year was 800 in 2018, and an average of 4.4 deaths occur per year to do it.

              That’s 0.55% mortality for this one mountain.

              Of course, the more participants, the lower the percentage goes down. But we are still only talking about a handful of deaths vs hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of deaths from other ordinary activities.

              If you apply the same odds to any other sport they would probably be banned. Could you imagine if 9 NFL players died every year? It’s roughly less than 1 per year at the moment I believe and that’s still pretty bad.

              I’m sure it would, especially if the sport was accessible to everyone (which mountain climbing is not).

              For us regular folks, I’m more concerned with how many people drown doing recreational activities, or die in car accidents doing non-important travelling, or die from legally accessible drugs and alcohol.

              I think the outrage over “allowing” mountain climbing is misplaced. That’s my opinion.

    • coffeetest@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      K2 is an incredibly dangerous mountain. The possibility of a rescue attempt would depend on many factors that we have no way to know. In these sorts of situations even other climbers nearby might have a complete different opinion. In many cases like this people are often not thinking correctly believing they saw something that wasn’t even there or just completely misperceived due to attitude or exhaustion or illness.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re thinking of the Himalaya above a certain height. There it’s impossible to rescue.

      On K2, multiple knowledged people have said in interviews that usually you would only need to give him oxygen and then he should have been able to descend himself. Eyewitnesses say that to their knowledge he couldnt move by himself anymore. But those eyewitnesses also said he was dead within an hour, which has been proven to be wrong.

      The critical thing here is that no one was asked for help. The crews trying to summit simply decided to continue upwards, and no one tried to bring him down the mountain or ask for help from the basecamp.

  • UlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    When interviewed by Norwegian media she explained that they tried helping, but after a while they had to move since it was one of the most dangerous parts of the route and the queue was building up behind them, which could lead to a far worse situation.

    This isn’t like walking past someone on your afternoon trip with 1000 meter elevation.

    Another expert questioned why the man was allowed to join the journey in the fist place as his equipment was below the usual standard needed to ascend K2. You can’t easily bail out once you are up there.

      • Blastasaurus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tonnes of hikes and Parks around Vancouver now require a pass to enter in order to control the crowds. My partner and I refer to this as “nature’s full”. It really sucks.

      • UlrikHD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are 8 billions of us and it’s a world famous mountain infamous for killing a lot of those who try ascending it.

        I would have loved to try climbing it if I had the resources and it weren’t for the fact I’d probably die if I tried it.

  • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this is a stupid accusation. the video shows only several seconds of the situation while they claim to have attended to him for hours, removing all context. and they obviously don’t understand how difficult it is to save someone on the top of such a high elevation mountain

    • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Welcome to what we call news these days. You just described what my local teams would call “Investigative” reporting ie: “removing all context.”

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but I also remember when a pair of climbers got sick on Nanga Parbat and they flew rescue team in a helicopter from K2 base camp to help them. They managed to get one climber down. For me it’s clear that if the Norwegian lady got injured the ascent would be cancelled and no one would be stepping over her. But he was just a porter so tough luck, the show must go on.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A record-breaking mountaineer has denied allegations that her team climbed over a dying porter to reach the summit of K2 in Pakistan to become the world’s fastest climber to scale all peaks above 8,000 metres.

    During the Norwegian’s ascent, porter Mohammed Hassan fell off a sheer edge at a height of about 8,200 metres.

    Austrian climbing duo Wilhelm Steindl and Philip Flämig, who were also on K2 that day, said footage they later recorded using a drone showed climbers walking over his body instead of trying to rescue him.

    Flämig told Austria’s Standard newspaper: “He is being treated by one person while everyone else is pushing towards the summit.

    According to Steindl, who visited the porter’s family after descending the mountain, Hassan took the job of rope fixer in order to pay for his diabetic mother’s medical bills despite his lack of experience.

    He fell on what is probably the most dangerous part of the mountain where the chances of carrying someone off were limited by the narrow trail and poor snow conditions.”


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!