• burningquestion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They compared a basket of streaming services to an average-priced cable package, which loosely makes sense. Individual streaming services are usually only a fraction of the content of a cable package, so if you want to compare prices, comparing the price of a comparable-size bundle of goods is a good place to start.

    It all varies from market to market, they used a national average. Their numbers wouldn’t hold up in my locale.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I upvoted for generally a good point but the comparable size bundle of goods does not really make sense here - no one will do that.

      For me the most comparable bundles were:

      1. Cable TV with HD, 100mbps internet

      2. 1gbps internet, with 2 streaming services

      While from the cable perspective those do not represent the same thing, they are what I was willing to exchange for, and the second option is still significantly cheaper. I tether probably needs to be included because I needed more bandwidth to support streaming (although not that much more). I would not have considered option 2 with a bundle with the same “channels”: they are not equivalent value to me as a viewer