• skogens_ro@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Who are these donors and what does “eating” them actually entail?

      I’m surely misinterpreting you, because it sounds like you’re suggesting murdering people over SoMw bullshit.

      • QHC@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure parent is making a glib reference to the common “eat the rich” saying. It’s meant to be a provocative way to illustrate a larger message of anti-capitalism and the immorality of extreme wealth disparity.

        • skogens_ro@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s demonise a subset of the population and joke about murdering them just like my ideological comrades did in the 20th century! Look how provocative I’m being.

          • QHC@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Defending billionaires is an even more ammoral act than making a joke you don’t like, comrade.

            • skogens_ro@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I dislike seeing radicals joke about murdering their enemies. It dehumanises them which helps extremism takes hold.

              Of course that is the point of such jokes, but you shouldn’t be surprised if people call you out on it.

              • QHC@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, it absolutely is the point. I don’t think billionaires should exist, full stop. They have already dehumanized everyone but themselves, so IMO turnaround is completely fair in this situation. Starting with a very extreme demand like “eat the rich” gives us lots of room to negotiate their surrender.

                In general, I agree with you. But some cases are too important and cannot be reasoned with. As an otherwise avowed pacifist, I’d put “punch a Nazi in the face” on this list of acceptable moral hypocrisy, too.

                • skogens_ro@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re kidding yourself if you think it’s a negotiation tactic. When the revolution comes, such revisionism will get you executed by true believers.

                  But at least you’re useful to them for the time being. Someone needs to radicalise the people who will carry out the purges.