ooli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · edit-27 months agoMexico's new president!i.redd.itimagemessage-square214fedilinkarrow-up11.89Karrow-down142file-text
arrow-up11.85Karrow-down1imageMexico's new president!i.redd.itooli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · edit-27 months agomessage-square214fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMadBigote@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down3·7 months agoThat happened in small cities and some hot states. They’d never dare to attack directly a Presidential Candidate.
minus-squareCorkyskog@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·7 months agoWhy? Are they afraid UN peace keeping forces would be deployed or that the US would step in?
minus-squareBelastend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·7 months agoThe last time Mexican Cartels pissed the USA off, the largest cartel in Mexican History got shafted. So yeah, they are pretty afraid of direct US involvement.
minus-squaredriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 months agoAnd by shafted, they mean the opposite cartel got armed by the “Fast and Furious” operation
minus-squareBelastend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoI mean, you win some, you lose some. Nwver said they were effective.
minus-squareJakeroxs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoMaybe they were talking about the Gulf Cartel?
That happened in small cities and some hot states. They’d never dare to attack directly a Presidential Candidate.
Why? Are they afraid UN peace keeping forces would be deployed or that the US would step in?
The last time Mexican Cartels pissed the USA off, the largest cartel in Mexican History got shafted. So yeah, they are pretty afraid of direct US involvement.
And by shafted, they mean the opposite cartel got armed by the “Fast and Furious” operation
I mean, you win some, you lose some. Nwver said they were effective.
Which one? When? Curiously asking.
Maybe they were talking about the Gulf Cartel?
Removed by mod