• bradbeattie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    5 months ago

    You can ignore all games from publishers on Steam. I’d recommend doing this with any publisher with anti-consumer practices.

    • HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Best thing is: I heard they see the number on their publisher dashboard next to the followers. Don’t know if it’s true, but I like the idea.

      Fuck Ubisoft.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      Holy shit, I didn’t know you could do this. If there was a way to block all F2P games too, my store would be so much cleaner.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would block games with microtransactions, being free to play, without microtransactions, is itself a positive.

            • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I mean, ok?

              You can’t just expect things to be provided for free, that isn’t how it works

              • Taokan@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yep - we get it. But some of us don’t enjoy the effects that microtransactions have on the game experience, and would prefer not to play those kinds of games. A filter whereby we could just hide those games, and browse ones that we would enjoy, that are more targeted for us, would both save us time and increase the likelihood of us finding a game we want to buy, improving the shopping experience and putting more money into game developers’ and Steam’s pockets. Similar to how the google play store offers a “premium/paid apps” section, because while much of the market prefers free to play and doesn’t mind ads or microtransactions, they know some of us loath it and would rather pay up front for an experience that doesn’t go there, and they make more money when they help shoppers shop.

                • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I was specifically referencing the comment above saying they wanted a free to play game with no micro transactions- which means no monetization model.

              • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                It can be. It has been in the past. Locally hosted servers used to be common.