• bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay? That means it’s impossible to intervene with positive results, right?

      It’s a literal rule of the universe, lol.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US having involvement in Iran’s oil in the past has nothing to do with future positive results from whatever intervention you are suggesting.

        I’m not sure what you are so upset about. You made a false statement minimizing US involvement in the creation of Iran’s current conservative hellscape and I replied with factual data showing US involvement. Conservatism is a plague of oppression. You should not defend conservatives. They do not need or deserve your defense.

        If by “intervention” you mean invading Iran to liberate the citizens, I really don’t know if that would be successful or not. Maybe it would be.

        The citizens certainly need saving. But, I suspect US conservatives would be very opposed to an invasion to liberate people who are suffering (conservatives prefer that people suffer). I also suspect non-conservatives (normal people) in the US will be resistant to invading a country for any reason at all, based on past sentiments. So, even if an invasion would be successful, I doubt it could happen. That’s why I think their best hope is revolution without intervention.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey man, wake me up when these problems get solved doing something I don’t suggest.

          I can wait.

                • bobman@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Uhh… what?

                  Why are you saying I didn’t suggest anything when I clearly did.

                  You can keep the snide remarks to yourself, btw. Try to discuss in a civil manner.

                  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Your first post:

                    Pretty sure US never had access to Iranian oil reserves.

                    Your second post:

                    Okay? That means it’s impossible to intervene with positive results, right? It’s a literal rule of the universe, lol.

                    To the untrained eye, your posts appear to lack specificity or detail. Additionally, there does not appear to be a premise suggesting a solution to any problem. However, I’m certain a knowledgable scholar would quickly decipher the coded guidance you have provided us here.

                    Good sir or madam, perhaps you could elucidate us on which of your fine comments have suggested a solution. And also, perhaps you could also state the problem you believe your solution would solve. I shall wait here in the sitting room.

                    Good day to you.