Pope Francis condemned the “very strong, organised, reactionary attitude” in the US church and said Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Pope Francis has blasted the “backwardness” of some conservatives in the US Catholic Church, saying they have replaced faith with ideology and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Francis’ comments were an acknowledgment of the divisions in the US Catholic Church, which has been split between progressives and conservatives who long found support in the doctrinaire papacies of St John Paul II and Benedict XVI, particularly on issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.

  • Brown5500@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s actually more of a doctrine that is made up by the organization and less something explicitly stated in the book. There probably are some psalms or other references that use the word (translated as) “unchanging”, but in context, the original audience would probably not have interpreted it in the same way. Think God’s love and power will never fail, not God will literally never experience anything or change. In the 10 commandments story, Moses has a conversation with god and changes his mind.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of things like this.

      The Levitical Law condemning Homosexuality was originally one condemning Pedophilia, but King James changed it in his translation in order to throw off suspicions that he was gay, which he totally was.

      • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s actually somewhat more complicated than that, and relates to the evolution of English words. The word “fornication” I believe was in a state of evolution when KJV was written, originally having a meaning more in-line with “married people who visit prostitutes” (a major issue of the day). It quickly evolved to include all premarital and homosexual relations. I’m not sure how cleanly the timing is, but King James himself had male lovers.

        I am of the belief that KJV was not anti-gay as written. Language just caught up to it. It wasn’t a big stretch, as homophobia was a common unofficial position pretty much unbroken between 100AD and 1500AD or so.