• mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    “More performant” citation needed. Very well written Rust might be extremely fast, yes, but Rust is also a hard language to get right. Swift is far from a slow language and I would not be surprised if the average rust programmer barely if at all manages to beat out the average swift programmer in terms of speed. As for the amount of programmers interested, hard to tell, but given the sheer amount of Swift devs I’d not be surprised if there were quite a few interested ones and I am unconvinced Rust programmers are statistically more likely to be interested in Browser development.

      • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Benchmarks mean nothing. These aren’t the results of code written by an average programmer. Edit: and as a general note I would also like to point out the relative inconsistency of the results in terms of factor, only further reinforcing my point. I like Rust and all but we do need to admit it doesn’t magically solve all our problems.

        • Evening Newbs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Benchmarks mean nothing.

          You’re free to suggest another method of comparing the two languages’ performance. This is the best we’re have, and Rust wins in every single benchmark shown there.

          These aren’t the results of code written by an average programmer.

          Citation needed.

          I like Rust and all but we do need to admit it doesn’t magically solve all our problems.

          I never said it did. I simply pointed out that it’s demonstrably faster than Swift.