• fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    IDK what it was, but Civ 6 just didn’t do it for me. Going back to 5 I’ll still easily get through a 20 hour game, but something about 6 I can’t get past even mid game.

    • DoctorNope@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have nearly 1500 hours played in Civ V. Never completed a single Civ VI game. Hoping they rediscover whatever it was that made 5 so great!

      • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        So it’s not just me. I had all Civs since Civ II and spent probably more hours in each than in any other game. Somehow I played a bit of Civ VI and gave up.

        I did wonder if I just got tired of civ games.

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m also a Civ V truther. VI never hooked me at all but I still regularly go back to V as a comfort game.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      As someone who only ever played civ 6, I played one game for a whole week and never got bored.

      So whatever draws you to civ 5, I am drawn in to civ 6 the same way.

      I find that very interesting, considering you don’t like it as much.