The super privacy-focused third-party ROM, GrapheneOS now officially supports the Google Pixel 9, 9 Pro, and 9 Pro XL.

  • evo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There isn’t a chance in hell you’re getting Gemini Nano outside of the stock ROM.

      • evo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because it’s proprietary software. They have an open source model (based off it) called Gemma but Gemini Nano is super locked down. There aren’t even public APIs for 3rd party developers to use it through the OS yet.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          An enormous portion of Google’s products are proprietary and yet still made freely available to anyone.

          • evo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            None of those are cutting edge AI models that could be ripped open and examined if people had access to the files. It’s not just an app or something, there are internal trade secrets at risk.

      • Noxious@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because Google is a monopolistic piece of shit and they try to lock you in to their shitty, privacy-invasive ecosystem. In my opinion it’s like a hundred times worse than Apple. Only Google hardware (phones and tablets) are worth buying, but only for the strong hardware security features, definitely not for the stupid proprietary software they come with by default.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          In my opinion it’s like a hundred times worse than Apple

          LOL are you high?

            • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Not to mention that even with the stock OS you can disable most if not all sniffing components. Of course Google still has root but they don’t put their typically don’t embed obfuscated stuff because they don’t need to.

              Note that I’m not arguing that Google isn’t privacy invasive “because you can turn it all off.” The user shouldn’t have to go through this trouble to recover their privacy and the user experience definitively degrades if you do.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Definitely high. It’s pretty funny how people manufactured this privacy perception and projected it over Apple. Apple was happy to capitalize on it and keep it going. Reminds me of the security perception over BlackBerry. Hot air either way.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean Apple is certainly more private than stock Android of any flavor, but Google at least gives you the option to take a bunch of that privacy back.