• Noxious@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d say they are objectively better, because are independent, free & open source apps, instead of relying on patching Google’s proprietary software.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      They aren’t better IF you enjoy most of YouTubes features. Usability is key, and messing around with Revanced manager twice a year has been worth it easily.

      Being OS doesn’t suddenly make worse UX better.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which one of those do I pick if I actually want to be logged in and have Youtube keep track of my watch history, automatically synchronized between devices?

      • Noxious@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you want to use YouTube for that, it seems like ReVanced is your only option. But you can also create an account on a Piped instance, and have your playlists synced. LibreTube is the only app that supports this.

      • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Revanced with MicroG. I use YouTube 50/50 on mobile and Shield (SmartTube) and if my watch history, subscriptions etc. didn’t work, I wouldn’t be using it.