• michael@lemmy.chrisco.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yep we have different lemmy/mastodon/etc… instances talking with one another. Anyone can set up something like activityhub. Its a fun place in my opinion!

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          enjoy the mainstream memes and discussion, but avoid the algorithmic content slop from them. That’s how I see the fediverse. It’s a win in my book.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The fediverse is just a barnacle on the larger Internet at this point. It has to become more - we need to make our own web

    • Reddit is better.@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ehhhh, the OG internet connected better because all nodes were well connected. The Fediverse is a series of single servers that can’t even sync all data across themselves. It’s cute, but it’s post-it notes on strings atm

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Free hosting, for everyone, without ads.

    Ut-oh.

    (But seriously, while it wasn’t free, having an account with an ISP used to come with 10 MB of personal webspace without ads or anything. That’s something you never really see these days.)

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Alternately, what’d be really neat would be an easy way to mostly completely do a webpage setup for someone using the free hosting options that do exist.

      Like, a tool that makes handling deploying something to Github Pages or Cloudflare Pages or whomever else offers basically free web hosting that isn’t nerdy to the point that you need a 6,000 word document to explain the steps you’d have to take to get a webpage from a HTML editor to being actually hosted.

      Or, IDK, maybe going back for ye old domain.com/~username/ web hosting could be an interesting project to take on, since I’m sure handling file uploads like that should be trivial (lots and loooots of ways to do that.). Just have to not end up going Straight To Jail offering hosting for people, I suppose.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I think clearnet is done for. Maybe something like i2p could be worth investing time into.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Go back to site directories.

    Curate your news feed.

    Stop using a single corporate search engine.

    Participate in online social communities, not in social media.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    When you remove the barriers to entry, the average quality users decreases, leading to an increase of corporate interest in an attempt to market to them all. These corporations do not care about the environment, and they run what the masses haven’t yet trashed in order to commodify it for maximum profit.

    First the planet, then the Internet, next who knows? Maybe the entire human genome. Soon everyone will have to pay to remove dream ads and there will be a paywall inhibiting serotonin production without a subscription.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Indeed, Reddit was a great example of this. All of the stupid things they tried to pull off in the past few years (selling user data, turning off the API, insulting their users, VPN blocking, to name a few) would have not worked when they were a growing website. Now that they have so many low quality users, they can do that successfully because they know that said users are too dumb to realize how they’re being abused. Even larger websites like Twitter and Facebook operate this way.

      The takeaway here is: don’t focus on having many users, focus on having good users. All relationships are a two-way street, and if you’re on the side of the street with too many people, you don’t have any personal leverage on your own. It’s in your best interests to get out of that relationship.

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Back in the days of the wild frontier things were chaotic, anarchic, violent, and unconstrained.

    Then came the churches, then came the schools
    Then came the lawyers, then came the rules
    Then came the trains and the trucks with their loads
    And the dirty old track was the Telegraph Road

    And now we’re all fenced in, regulated, allowed to wander only in approved lanes… oh, wait, sorry, we’re talking about the internet, not real life!

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Globalization ruined it.

      Not like in politics (though similar), but in the sense that instead of a space of generally sane people where you don’t have to follow any conventions of fashion or social expectations of idiots, like a park where people sit in grass and eat sandwiches, it has turned into something like a mall built in place of that park, with guards, ads, bullshit and shopping apes.

      There definitely was trash. You just didn’t have to see it. You’d not go to a central recommendations system, like in social nets or search engines. You’d go to web directories and your friends. Like for many things you still do.

      Now there’s the fake social pressure of being on corporate platforms. Why fake? Because you still really need and talk to the same amount people you would back then, even fewer.

      That fake social pressure was their killer invention. Human psychology is unprepared for critically evaluating the emotions from being able to scroll through half the world of other people right now. They don’t generally use that seemingly easy ability to reach anyone anywhere, while when it was a bit harder, they would, but the fake feeling of having it is very strong.

      It’s a mouse trap.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    How did we get here? Adtech, tracking, monetization.

    Can we go back? By removing the ubiquitous affiliate marketing financial incentives, so no.

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This. Lemmy is the way to go. Decentralized Communities connected via API.

    I don’t see many other possibilities. The system needs a “free for ever” mechanic or big money shits into everything.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Lemmy is the way to go. Decentralized Communities connected via API.

      This only works to a degree. Eventually, the communities that allow people to register most easily and see the most active content become the overwhelming majority of the content on the system. And if these communities don’t do a good job of self-policing, they just become mini-2008-style Reddits, filling up with the same bot accounts and serial assholes and sex pests that degraded the original.

      Bigger sites start swamping smaller sites with traffic and overwhelming the capacity of smaller communities, so you get waves of defederation and new Walled Gardens of content.

      The issue isn’t the technology, its the participants in that technology. Too many malicious actors piling onto a platform and either corrupting the administration or degrading the quality of content will inevitably lead to enshitification.

      Federation only mitigates this by allowing smaller instances to break away and abandon larger ones. It does nothing to screen the sincere and human actors from the malicious and automatic accounts.

      • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        the communities that allow people to register most easily and see the most active content become the overwhelming majority of the content on the system.

        hasnt this already happened with lemmy.world being the Big One?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re leading the pack. Although, that could change if some supermassive community like Threads ever implemented a Lemmy API.

          Still a relatively slight difference in scale between .world and Reddit compared to, say, .world and shi.tjustworks or lem.ee.

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            How does Threads federation work compared to Mastodon? Do they have an allow list?

            Mastodon users can subscribe to Lemmy communities so I’m curious if Threads can already federate with Lemmy.

            • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              so far, the threads implementation is similar to the mastadon ‘microblog’ model. i suspect they could interact with the new lemmy pieces that allow that part of the protocol on lemmy systems that dont block them.

              i picked mbin so i could have access to both the lemmy content and microblog content. ive been following a few threads accounts and have no intention of blocking them.

  • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The genie is already out of the bottle BUT, one solution would be to raise the barrier to entry again.

    Return the internet to the pre-“smart” phone era, in which a minimum bar of effort and knowledge needed to be present in order to connect and participate on the web.

    In 2008~2010, the flood gates opened for all the normies to stampede in and everything has been downhill since then.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I agree to an extent, but the problem is not so much the normies themselves as it is the massive commercial market they represent. You might point to mainstream social media as evidence of a problem with the people themselves, but you would be overlooking the fact that the surveillance and attention economies have meant these social media platforms are deliberately designed to position people against one another to drive engagement so these companies can charge more to advertisers. Discourse on the internet isn’t getting worse because there are more bad people online, it’s getting worse because companies have a financial incentive to turn us into bad people when we are online.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The normies are not the problem, they are the victims. The abusers are the giant corporation manipulating the masses and monetizing a publicly funded infrastructure for their own gains.