• JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So not as cheap as the (inflation adjusted) PS2 ($550) or PS4 ($540), but cheaper than the $780 of the PS3. PS1 was close at $620.
    Also games back in 1995 were around $50, which is $103 today.

  • ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just get a PC? Parts prices are low right now and they are far more useful than a console that has a “planned expiration” every 5-10 years.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That’s not really a good comparison. After 5-10 years you’re going to need a PC upgrade as well if you want to keep up with current game tech and run games at high settings. That can easily cost $700. Remember, consoles are usually mid-range computers.

  • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    well yeah, but that’s only because the slow death of “generations” will be complete by then. We already have a large swath of casual and/or younger gamers that are still gaming on PS4 because PS5 is too expensive and all the games work fine on PS4. Bump that forward by a generation, and what would you expect to happen? I don’t think it’s all that wild to expect that for the majority of the PS6’s lifespan, 100% of games will also come out on PS5. Hell, I’d bet even low-budget and indies continue to come out on PS4! It’ll be like phones - the PS6 is there for the people that want to pay out the nose for the bleeding edge, and the PS5 and Pro will still be there for everyone else that wants a console gaming experience. And all those kids playing fortnite and minecraft? They’ll still be playing that on their childhood PS4.