• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    MicroEmacs

    In testing, to settle a bet by a rabid cult-of-vi peer, I opened a given set of files in each editor, each a day apart because I couldn’t be arsed to clear caches. This guy, otherwise a prince, was railing about emacs, but otherwise suffered days of waiting.

    10/10 the memory usage by his precious vi was same-or-more than emacs.

    There’s so many shared libs pulled in by the shell that all the fuddy doomsaying about bloat is now just noise.

    I avoid vi because even in 1992 it was crusty and wrong-headed. 30 years on the hard-headed cult and the app haven’t changed.

    I don’t see how microEmacs can improve on what we have by default, and I worry that the more niche the product is the harder it will be to find answers online. But I’m willing to be swayed if anyone can pitch its virtues.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      MicroEmacs was written in 1985 and has nothing to do with GNU Emacs (which people just call Emacs these days). It’s entirely outside of the vi-vs-emacs war.