• skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well, for one thing, an M1 Abrams main battle tank has better front sightlines than most trucks on the road today.

    And it isn’t even that much more dangerous to get hit by because of the giant flat-face front impact planes of the trucks. Used to be if you got hit by a car it would roll you up over the hood, now you just die.

    I have to imagine that will impact the testing and design at least somewhat.

    Edit: fixed the image link

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not sure about the second part, tanks are built to go over things. Their “negative slant” seems more likely to push things under than a car’s hood or a truck/SUV’s flat face.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh sure if you get run over by a tank you’re going under the treads and it’s lights out for you. No question. My point was though, with sedans or older smaller trucks, the point of impact would hit around waist level on most adults and you’d be thrown up and over the hood, which would bleed off a lot of the lethal impact damage. These days the full weight of the truck is going to hit you in the chest and shoulders and you’re not getting thrown anywhere but forward and under.

        If you’re a child, you’re pretty screwed either way, but modern big trucks are way, way more dangerous in a frontal impact than they used to be just based on the shape of the things. That big flat face is like getting slammed directly into a wall at 80mph.