New York City on Tuesday reached a $175,000 settlement with a Staten Island police officer who said he had been a victim of retaliation for giving traffic tickets to people with connections to the upper echelons of the Police Department.

The officer, Mathew Bianchi, filed a lawsuit against the city last May. The suit said that he had been transferred out of his precinct’s traffic unit after Jeffrey Maddrey, then the chief of patrol and now the department’s highest-ranking uniformed officer, asked that he be punished. Officer Bianchi had issued a ticket to a woman with whom Chief Maddrey was said to be friends, according to the suit.

“This settlement is a vindication for our client, allowing him to close this chapter and continue his service with the N.Y.P.D.,” John Scola, Officer Bianchi’s lawyer, said on Tuesday. “We hope that Officer Bianchi’s courage and this decisive outcome will inspire other officers to come forward as whistle-blowers.”

  • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Several members of the Police Benevolent Association allegedly approached him, one telling him that he had to obey the courtesy-card customs or the union wouldn’t protect him.

    Looks like they were correct about that. The police union protects almost anything, except giving those with union ‘courtesy cards’ a traffic ticket apparently. That is just too far.

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unions are just organized workers, sometimes the workers are dicks and wrong unfortunately.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Cops aren’t workers, they’re the enforcers of Capital.

          The only surprising thing here is that this person thought they could exercise copfriend privileges against an actual cop without getting some kind of blowback. XD

          • JTskulk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            They’re both, but you calling them that is a non-sequiter. The opposite of workers is owners, not people who work for owners.

              • JTskulk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t follow. There are workers and capital owners. I’m saying that cops are workers since they work and don’t own. As you said, they are enforcers of capital, which is their job that they’re paid to do. I think we both agree they’re not capital owners, so if you say they aren’t workers, what are they?

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Petite bourgeoise, the managerial class who wield structural control over the labor power of others but lack sufficient capital to simply hire someone else to maintain that structure for them. Same as gang members, small business owners, corporate middle-managers, etc.

                  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    So you’re describing different types of workers, right? They’re called “class traitors” since they work against their own class.