Grindr’s Return-to-Office Ultimatum Has Gutted a Uniquely Queer Space in Tech::Two weeks after staff at queer dating app Grindr unionized, bosses ordered employees back to the office. Nearly half the app’s workers refused and have been laid off.

  • NormandyEssex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like the RTO was rushed and mishandled for some reason. I can only guess they wanted to punish the unionizers or just do a major layoff without calling it a layoff.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      162
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Article explains it:

      Shortly after Arison was hired as CEO in October, Twitter users unearthed tweets he’d written expressing support for conservative politicians, many of whom had expressed anti-LGBTQ+ views. Robin was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt after he told staff he would change, but says the recent alleged union busting has broken that trust.

      They hired a rightwingers as CEO, and even if he changed his mind on social policy, he’s still obviously a Republican on fiscal.

      This is a way to get rid of highly paid people since the labor pool for tech ballooned after twitter fired everyone.

      He’s hoping for a short dip, then replacing everyone for cheaper salaries.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        135
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jesus. The CEO of Grindr is a supporter of homophobes. We truly are in the worst timeline.

        • Daqu@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          86
          ·
          1 year ago

          He googled “how to fuck the gays” and grindr was the top result.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. Grinder is a trash company now. I think it was even owned by a company in China for a while, which is just weird.

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seems like it would just be a useful database for blackmailing a bunch of closeted guys.

            • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s one of the older tricks, no pun intended. It used to be that you’d have a hard time getting a security clearance if you were gay, with the excuse being that you were vulnerable to blackmail. It’s less of a big deal now, but I can think of a wide class of politicians who would still be vulnerable to blackmail, and grindr is a very popular app during political conventions.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      The second part, I think people don’t pick up on that often enough. These return to office pushes are soft layoffs. They get to do a layoff without paying severance or even unemployment.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While this is true, they also don’t get to have as much control and who leaves.

        Normally when you do layoffs you strategically keep the people on who were best for the company.

        • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Corporate culture these days seems to value people who will eat shit and smile, not expect raises and not quit when they should above most other metrics… so they do keep the people “best” for the company.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can only guess they wanted to punish the unionizers or just do a major layoff without calling it a layoff.

      Maybe, but this way you have no control on who leave, which probably are the people you would like to keep since they are the most valuable people you have and being good they could find a job that accomodate their WFH request.