• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Terrible for him. Great for everyone else that that 40 billion is now in the hands of other people. 

    It’s also ironic, that he is single-handedly the greatest redistributor of his own wealth. 

    • superkret@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Terrible for him

      Not really, and that’s the obscene part. Literally absolutely nothing changed about his standard of living by losing $40B.
      He could have solved world hunger for years with that money, and wouldn’t even have had to give anything up for it.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      40 billion going into the bank accounts of investors that previously owned Twitter stock certainly is a redistribution of wealth, but I doubt it’s the kind you’re referring to.