X is suing California over social media content moderation law::X, the social media company previously known as Twitter, is suing the state of California over a law that requires companies to disclose details about their content moderation practices.

  • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    You said that government business is whatever the government passes laws about, which literally gives the government unlimited justification to do anything and everything because, by definition, it’s the proper business of government under that standard.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the job of the government to inspect and regulate businesses and this is a reasonable and frankly way overdue example of them doing exactly that. Nothing unreasonable about it and calling it unlimited intrusion or whatever makes you look like the dumbest of libertarians, which is REALLY saying something.

      • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it isn’t the purpose of government to just make demands of private businesses. It’s absolutely unreasonable for the government to do so with intent to censor

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          None of that is true. Go away if you the only thing you have to contribute is libertarian lies about basic accountability being tyranny.

          • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lmao why should I go away just because you have nothing except outright lies to defend your demands to terminate basic rights.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              why should I go away

              Because you have nothing but lies and misunderstandings of basic facts to contribute, neither of which are beneficial to anyone.

              because you have nothing except outright lies

              Going for the gold medal in projection?

              demands to terminate basic rights

              There’s no basic right to facilitate stochastic terrorism.

              • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                The fact the you bring up shit like “stochastic terrorism” just proves my point. I see no further reason to engage since you’re clearly off the deep end

            • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              How does asking to see how they moderate their content behind closed doors terminating basic rights? Can you describe which right they’re terminating here?

        • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Governments make demands of private businesses all the time with things like workers rights, safety regulations, emissions standards, etc. We don’t live in a libertarian no holds barred corporate wonderland and we’re better for it as these businesses have long proved they can’t be trusted if left to their own devices.