Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

  • CaptObvious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are more dangerous than any dog. Can we ban them on looks too, please?

    Oh wait. The US already does this. It’s called “racism.”

    • dan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tell you what, if we specifically genetically engineer people to be aggressive and powerful and they start eating toddlers faces then I’m cool with banning them too.

      “Dog racism”, fuck off.

      • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a bad faith argument people make to use people’s morality against them. Pitt owners tend to be conservative nazi types and they think they’re clever trying to use "woke"language

    • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the sense that humans are responsible for these natural abuses existing, sure. Humans can stop being dangerous in this sense by not breeding these unnatural predators.