I’m just tired. On the last post about having Linux at our work, many people that seems to be an IT worker said there have been several issues with Linux that was not easy to manipulate or control like they do with Windows, but I think they just are lazy to find out ways to provide this support. Because Google forces all their workers to use Linux, and they have pretty much control on their OS as any other Windows system.

Linux is a valid system that can be used for work, just as many other companies do.

So my point is, the excuse of “Linux is not ready for workplaces” could be just a lack of knowledge of the IT team and/or a lack of intention to provide to developers the right tools to work.

  • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Lolol gnome, stable, 🤣🤣🤣

    And I guess kdes swap to Wayland has been an easy joy for most people. I definitely don’t see bitching every other week about electron apps breaking.

    • Craftkorb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      KDE is still working great on X11, which is the standard for most users anyway.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      GNOME is the king of stability and professionalism, like it or not. KDE is like the GNU car meme, except GNOME is also open source, so KDE has no bragging rights. On top of it, GNOME is the Windows of extension ecosystem, putting cherry on top of the truffle cake.