President Joe Biden will announce the creation of the first-ever federal office of gun violence prevention on Friday, fulfilling a key demand of gun safety activists as legislation remains stalled in Congress, according to two people with direct knowledge of the White House’s plans.

Stefanie Feldman, a longtime Biden aide who previously worked on the Domestic Policy Council, will play a leading role, the people said.

Greg Jackson, executive director of the Community Justice Action Fund, and Rob Wilcox, the senior director for federal government affairs at Everytown for Gun Safety, are expected to hold key roles in the office alongside Feldman, who has worked on gun policy for more than a decade and still oversees the policy portfolio at the White House. The creation of the office was first reported by The Washington Post.

  • endhits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You claim that no one is asking to get rid of guns, and then call for a ban on an entire class of firearms (and a vague one, “military-style weapons”, which is intentionally vague and demonstrates a lack of knowledge of firearms).

    Make a decision please.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 2nd Amendment was not written with AR-15s or any other military-style weapons in mind. A full ban on those weapons is reasonable and possible.

      • endhits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        With that logic, the 1st amendment doesn’t apply to the internet, phones, television, photos, or video.

        Your understanding of the second amendment (and firearms in general) is flawed, and any attempt to disarm the working class shall be frustrated. It will not happen. A ban on rifles is not reasonable, it is class warfare.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not flawed. Your understanding is flawed. You live in fear. Don’t live in fear.

          • endhits@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t live in fear. I hope to never have to use my tools, no matter what they are. But just how I need my socket set when my car breaks down, I have my firearms if I need to defend myself or my loved ones.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You must be living in fear of something since you feel the need to be armed all the time. What are you afraid of?

                • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I wonder if a pocket knife could kill 60 people and wound more than 400 from a hotel room in Las Vegas…

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hahahaha.

        Yet more ignorance.

        You could own canons when it was written, and fully automatic weapons already existed.

        It was written with exactly the change in tech in mind, and if you had bothered to educate yourself (by reading things like Federalist Papers or the Adams-Jefferson letters) you’d know this. But you’d rather operate from ideology and hubris.

          • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Automatic is defacto illegal unless you go through a very lengthy process whereby you register yourself and your weapon and pay money directly to the ATF. Only very few individuals own automatics for this reason.

            Literally every modern handgun and rifle is semi automatic, save for skeet shooting break-action shotguns and some revolvers.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Literally every modern handgun and rifle is semi automatic, save for skeet shooting break-action shotguns and some revolvers.

              So? My point still stands. It’s designed to kill as fast as possible. It should be banned.

              I will always take the side of our school children and a safe society over guns. More guns do not create safety, they exacerbate violence. Most other developed countries do not have this kind of violence, and they do not have the easy access to weapons designed to kill as many as possible as fast as possible.

              • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So? My point still stands. It’s designed to kill as fast as possible. It should be banned.

                So you’re calling for virtually all guns to be banned then except for shotguns and revolvers?

                • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m calling for any weapon that’s designed to kill as many people as possible in as little time as possible to be banned.

                  • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    And that’s 99% of weapons, because what’s what guns do, they all kill things with a single trigger pull. You’re asking for a de facto ban and that’s absolutely a losing position.

                    And that’s not even to mention that your position effectively means “I only believe the police and the military should have guns”. Because that’s what would happen.

              • Narauko@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                To quote Benjamin Franklin here, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” Anyone is free to relocate to those other developed countries you mentioned if they do not want the burden of their own personal liberties and rights, but stripping those rights from everyone else in the USA doesn’t fly well here.

                • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Anyone is free to relocate to those other developed countries you mentioned

                  Not true. You obviously know nothing about immigration to other countries.

                  • Narauko@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Last I checked the USA wasn’t on any country’s immigration blacklist. You still need to have some kind of useful skill for a work visa, and there are unique costs to international moves, but it’s far from illegal to move away from the US. Additional costs if you want to renounce your US citizenship instead of holding dual citizenship wherever you move to, but that’s a personal decision there unless you move to a place that requires renouncing citizenship as part of gaining it like the US does. Unless you were conflating free as is freedom for free as in no cost, but that would be silly given the context where this entire discussion thread is about freedom.