• solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Spoiler alert: it will be “send us more money!”. That’s what they always settle on.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    We have no fucking time. They told us, explicitly, what they were going to do.

    Any halfway decent opposition party would have already had responses ready for each and every one of the executive orders that have been signed

  • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s amazing that these assholes need time. Fuck off with the triangulation. It didn’t work in the election and it won’t work now.

    The only thing they have to do is take a principled stand in favor of people. Everyone has value (besides Nazis). But they are too interested in appealing to corporate interests and republicans.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Exactly. They need time to figure out a strategy where they can appeal to their base while also proposing contradictory public policy that harms their base. Judging by their performance in the past three presidential elections, this strategy will never exist but it sure as hell hasn’t caused them to do any sort of self reflection.

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    We’ve decided to rename the Democrat party to Republican Lite in order to appeal to more voters.

  • Fisherman75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well the republicans are in some kind of hyperfascist accelerationist mode so I’m not sure exactly how much time we have to give them.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Translation: “We need time to figure out a way to look like we’re doing something without risking actually changing anything.”

    If we’re not careful, we might accidentally do something that the voters like but that our owners don’t approve of.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m wondering where are the big names in the Democratic party and the left?

    There is a palpable atmosphere of fear coming from a large population in America and there is silence from the “opposition” party. Why isn’t Obama and Michelle organizing and speaking at rallies? Why aren’t other prominent Democratic leaders not trying to rally support for a genuine resistance. Not the resistance of 2016, which I feel failed due to no true national leadership from the Democratic party.

    Maybe this is happening and I just don’t see it, but it sure feels like the national Democratic leaders and influencers just threw up their hands and said “well, we’ve tried nothing and we are all out of ideas. You’re on your own to figure it out. But remember, if your leaderless pent up fear and anger turns to violence we won’t support you.”

    • Jonathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve been wondering that as well and I had a kind of scary thought; maybe there is no opposition party this time around because what’s happening is exactly what all parties involved want to be happening. I’m just so baffled by the state of politics in the US that I can’t help but to feel like we’re witnessing some kind of sea change in the fundamental structure of the government. Unfortunately it is not a progressive or thoughtful change in ideology.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Maybe this is happening and I just don’t see it

      Then they’re not doing it right.

    • root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ideally people would have seriously punished Ford for letting that Nixon prick get off scot free and fought against the personality cult that was built up for Reagan, but if we’re talking about this century, the democrats should have come up with something as soon as the tea party lunatics got in position to kneecap public sector unions during the first Obama administration.

      It didn’t help that the occupy protesters were made to look like their message was a motley hodgepodge of pet causes with no real cohesiveness.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      Democrats kept the filibuster around for this reason, right? They didn’t just keep it around to prevent progressive policy from passing, right?

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        The second they try to use it, the republicans will nuke it, citing the precedent that the democrats did it first with lower court judicial nominees when they refused to let a single one pass, same way they did with scotus nominees when democrats dared to use it one time in protest against the stunt they pulled with Garland.

        Force Dems to reign in minority power the tiniest bit and use that as an excuse to remove minority powers entirely the second they’re in the majority is pretty standard Rep SOP now.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Then the only point in preserving the filibuster was to block progressive legislation.

          At least Democrats didn’t have to codify Roe or pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.

          • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Trust me, I’m in agreement with you there. They really need to get their heads out of their asses and stop acting like the GOP fascists are going to follow the rules and act with integrity.

            And I’m being awfully generous here with assuming there’s a chance it isn’t malicious on their part, that maybe they really are just that incompetent to have missed the reality of this situation. Even though I don’t have much hope of that anymore.

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    You’ve had 8 years, 4 of which you had control of the white house. You’ve had enough time. You squandered it. Are you really going to do anything useful with even more?

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      They’ll see that as too controversial, wouldn’t want to divide the people…

      (/s, just in case)

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They wouldn’t have lost either.

      Pelosi tanking kneecapping any attempt to curb congressional insider trading certainly didn’t help. Nor did funding a fucking genocide. Their continued subservience to donors over their voters drives people away.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes time and time again they’ve proven that they’re willing to put anything and everything ahead of helping the American people. They want to have their cake and eat it too and are willing to go as far as losing elections if it means they don’t have to turn their backs on corporations or foreign governments engaging in genocide.