• Shanie@mastodon.tails.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone looking at the price tag vs the results knows a proxy war with a well-trained army, the side of the US and Ukraine, against formerly your biggest adversary is the least costly way to cripple your foe while hardly lifting a finger.

    ~$125 billion TOTAL, including humanitarian, in a sea of $800B+/yr is play money in war, and throwing Russia back with dollars is the largest blow to a man who thinks he’s militarily strong.

    It even makes China hesitate. I’d pay a lot more just for that.

    • JWBananas@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Edit to add: This is a sad justification to be involved in ending human life, regardless of merit.


      It’s especially peanuts when you consider that the VA won’t have to take care of the veterans either. In the long-term, that’s where most of the funding actually goes after you put boots on the ground.


      Edit to add:

      The costs of caring for post-9/11 war vets will reach between $2.2 and $2.5 trillion by 2050 — most of which has not yet been paid.

      Source:

      https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/economic/budget/veterans

      That is roughly 1/3 of the total estimated past/future costs of the wars.

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is Patton by proxy - “The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard to die for his.” Except instead of “the other bastard” being an enemy, it’s your allies.

      • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t worry, there’s still going to be plenty of vets who “hurt their backs” during training excersize and get lifetime disability pay. I got a cousin who brags about his.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes your cousin is still allowed to have a comfortable life after being hurt on military duty… That’s not “bragging”. That’s being recompensed.

          I bet if you actually talk to your cousin about the stuff they miss out on in life due to their disability… You’ll find that the trade still isn’t worth it. Things like being able to play with their kids without worrying about debilitating pain. But you know… At least they don’t have to actively work to live a normal life.

          Even if they’re 100% disabled. I don’t know anyone who “brags” about $45k a year. I have military associated hearing loss. The time I waste every day just trying to parse things other people are saying isn’t worth the ~$200 a month I’m given for it.

    • Gramatikal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not just that. It’s about oil & gas too. Ukraine is gar friendlier to the US and the EU. They also has the ability to sever Europe’s need for Russian energy.

      Every dollar is worth it.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And it provides your weapons industry with real life data from a large-scale conflict with equipment from multiple origins.

      And it advertises a competitors products as inferior, and yours as superior.

      I despise all these things, but from a purely economic viewpoint, this is interesting for business.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You can blame those deaths on Putin.

          Ukraine wouldn’t need those equipment if Putin didn’t invade a sovereign nation.

          He can literally decide tomorrow to pull back and no deaths would follow anymore.

        • Spzi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, but unclear what that implies. Some people say weapons kill people so we should not produce / supply weapons, expecting less people would die. Others point at aggressors using (their home made) weapons to kill people, pointing at the need to supply their victims, expecting less people would die.

          Comparing the track records of Russia (frequently invading and killing neighbors) and Ukraine (not so much) it’s easy for me to take sides. But the tragedy exists, which is why I despise all these things.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t call $125 billion “play money”, even if the US yearly military budget is $900 billion.

      The US military budget is egregious, and this just shows how much war is about funneling taxpayer money to the MIC.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk, nearly a trillion dollars a year is hardly easy to overlook so I find it hard to believe that this of all things is a red line.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      proxy war: a war instigated by a major power which does not itself become involved.

      Please don’t call it a proxy war, because it’s not.

        • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Amusingly, with North Korea providing munitions to Russia and Korea providing munitions to Ukraine, it’s now a proxy Korean War, which never ended.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technically… this war was “kind of instigated” by the EU out-bidding Russia in 2013 for the investment in a commercial agreement with Ukraine. Everybody at the time knew that Russia had to keep Ukraine under its boot or risk getting fucked long term in the Black Sea, so buying-out Ukraine’s allegiance was sort of like poking a bear… and the bear reacted pretty much as expected, by instantly invading Crimea… which also worked as expected to fortify Ukraine’s allegiance towards the West… which ultimately lead to Russia launching its “special military operation”… which everyone kind of expected to end in a couple days with the loss of Kyiv… but instead turned out to spectacularly show off Russia’s hand and military weakness, allowing for a proxy war to begin.

          The instigation was very tactful, playing the long game over 10 years, but it was there. Which is also expected when trying to start a proxy war against a nuclear power; even this low-key instigation, already got Russian crazies clamoring for nuclear retaliation, even when the war was obviously their own fail.

          • crackajack@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Technically… this war was “kind of instigated” by the EU out-bidding Russia in 2013 for the investment in a commercial agreement with Ukraine.

            If you know your history, the Yanukovych-administration in Ukraine at the time reneged on the deal with the EU and switched deal to Russia at the last minute, angering the ordinary Ukrainians (which caused tensions with the pro-Russian Ukrainians but that is another story). I distinctly remember it as it was all over the news at the time. So, it is Russia who outbid for Ukraine’s support in 2013 if anyone looks at it objectively.

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The EU agreement included higher investments than the Russian one (aka: EU outbid Russia)… that’s why, when Yanukovych (expectedly, as a Russian puppet) switched to the Russian one, the ordinary Ukrainians got… well, kind of pretty pissed.

              Russia didn’t outbid the EU, they puppeteered Ukraine away from the EU agreement, precisely because they could not outbid it.

              The rest worked as expected.

          • zephyreks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wasn’t Russia expecting Ukraine to capitulate (basically, like what Armenia did against Azerbaijan)?

            They only sent, what, 80000 troops on the initial drive to Kyiv?

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If Ukraine wanted to join Russia, they wouldn’t need to send any troops.

              So that is about 79999 troops too many.

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There is that… then there is this:

              It’s failure after failure after failure after failure… and it keeps going, a full clown show. There are actually some more that aren’t in the video.

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago
              instigator (noun)
              a person who brings about or initiates something.

              The country that did the invading was the instigator, full stop.

              Not how wars work. They’re like domino chains, if you know which one to push, you get the desired result.

              In this case:

              Do you need me to look up sources for the remaining dominos? (I’m on mobile, so I’d rather not)

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Bitch please, Russia and EU have a much longer history.

                The real “first domino” is somewhere during the Roman empire or even before.

                But the invasion domino is a much bigger threat than the dominoes before.

                Putin could just have decided NOT to invade. He had that power. Yet he pushed the domino anyway.

                • jarfil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Putin could just have decided NOT to invade. He had that power. Yet he pushed the domino anyway.

                  Putin could have tried to clean up shop in Russia around 2000-2008, he had that power back then. By instead trying to become a new Tsar, he set up himself to either invade over and over, or get killed.

                  It’s no coincidence the same year 2012 he got “reelected”, is when the EU started to sweet talk Ukraine; by then, the large dominoes were all set up, just needed that tiny first push.

                  By 2014, and 2022, any negative to invade would have him windowed.

    • zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russia’s military budget in 2019 was $65 billion. It’s a waste of money that’s only practical because the US is literally swimming in taxpayer money (mostly because the US doesn’t invest in itself, but that’s another issue).

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh thousands of people are dead but at least it wasn’t me and all it cost was billions of dollars.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We didn’t start the invasion. We’re helping the defenders of the invasion fight off the invaders.

        Everyone would be better off if Russia packed it in, but sometimes the barbarians are at the gates are you do in fact have to fight them off.

      • Shanie@mastodon.tails.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah bro just roll over when you’re getting taken over and if you ask for help you should think of the thousands you’re going to kill.

        Way to victim blame.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        can’t account for 61% of it’s $3.5 trillion in assets

        That’s the Men in Black fund. Defending the Earth ain’t cheap. 👾