[Sorry folks. When I submitted the article I had both the URL and added an image file as thumbnail for the article. Somehow the image file replaced the article. Here’s the article. Adding a link in here too].

  • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well yes but that’s the problem, we need to think outside the box, revolutions are seen as a thing of the past but maybe everyone could learn from the french

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So any revolution against aristocracy obviosly leads to a Bonaparte, is your theory huh. ok.

        • zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yep, I made a blanket statement about every revolution that has ever existed… Of course I didn’t say that, why are you putting words in my mouth? The French Revolution ended poorly for most in the following 40 years. That’s what I said.

      • SecondaryAnnetagonist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I believe Robespierre had lead a period of time known as the “reign of good times and normal vibes” where they all formed committees to talk out and mediate the the problems of the system they lived under.

          • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It ultimately gave us the ideals that would go on to end monarchism in Europe. It killed the French monarchy legitimacy until it was ultimately destroyed.

            Once again, only if you know nothing about the French revolution would you say that.