• Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why? You can just hire a dude to sing to you as you walk around. Just use a bard, bro.

    • FuntyMcCraiger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to swear by wired headphones.

      The audio quality, not needing batteries, the simplicity.

      But then I got a decent pair of Bluetooth headphones and I discovered how much wires got in my way. I discovered that the audio quality coming out of phones were garbage regardless of connection type, and the headphones I got would last weeks of daily use on one charge.

      Plus I would get a more water proof phone, and I would never have to worry about the headphone jack breaking inside of the port, or my headphones going flying off because I walked past a knob of whatever at just the right height to ruin my day.

      I still want phones to have the ports, but on mobile devices I’ll never use them. I just want others to be happy too.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My old Moto G3 was the only real waterproof phone, whatever you have I bet you take it out of your pocket to swim, and guess what, it had a headphone jack.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cables doesn’t consume battery

        When you plug earbuds into your phone, your phone is literally powering the earbuds. The cables transmit an electrical signal; they consume battery. The consumption is fairly negligible, of course, but so is modern Bluetooth.