• VexCatalyst@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really. Most big corporations require a NDA to use their toilets. Slight exaggeration but not by much.

    Wait and see.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s because they’re publicly traded.

        Information about their plans being in the wild but not formally announced adds all kinds of possibility for SEC involvement. You have to be very careful with how information is publicized to avoid insider trading or the appearance of it.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          NDAs contribute to insider trading, not mitigate it.

          It means the people who know they are doing shitty things can’t warn everyone else

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, they don’t. If you can’t track where information is, the ability of people to act on a tip massively increases, and the enforcement is much more difficult.

            They are effectively legally required to use NDAs when discussing future directions of their business. There may not be an explicit regulation you can point to, but when information is spread around without tight control and someone acts on it, the SEC can and very willingly does get involved. There’s a reason it’s effectively universal for any publicly traded company with meaningful legal representation, and it’s because it’s a ridiculous level of negligence to have those conversations without them.