Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel’s right to defend itself.

“Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to “remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.”

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Lmao Hamas would have launched them at Israel and we would be seeing world war 3 with nukes. The fact that you think Hamas would be more responsible with WMDs than US, which hasn’t used them since Japan, is bizzare

    • nomoreidiotz@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hamas is only in power because the Fatah agreed to give up armed struggle in exchange for self determination. They didn’t get self determination. They had colonies, settler attacks, area C and a wall around gaza.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Your comment does not argue against my point, but suddenly starts talking about something unrelated. Fine, to entertain your randomity, imagine Fatah has nukes. Would you believe they’d excercise no-first-strike policy, or would live by their promise to destroy Israel?

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        And if roles were reversed, how many countries do you think they’d have invaded? Basically US with sharia law.

        • nomoreidiotz@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Aaaah sure. I bet you’re German or something are you not?

          The genocidal trolls cannot deny the attrocities anymore (everybody knows) so they can only push the idea that the genocidees would be genociders if they had the chance. It was only a pre-emptive genocide if you will, wasn’t it?

          “It was self defense”

    • nomoreidiotz@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Shut the fuck up you piece of shit.

      If hamas had nuclear bombs the Israelis would have threated them better. But according to the genocide apologists history started in October 23 didn’t it?

        • nomoreidiotz@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Hamas would have no reason to use bombs if Palestinians weren’t getting colonized and killed for the last 80 years you goddamn idiot.

          Israel have nukes and never signed the non proliferation threaty. Either the west give them the Iran threatment or they have zero legitimacy in telling who gets bombs and who’s not.

        • nomoreidiotz@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          threated*

          Anyway stfu you’re an idiot if you think only the current genociders in charge deserve to get nukes.

          Give then to everybody or destroy them. You don’t get to keep it