• GiantRobotTRex@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If he’s not thinking clearly, why he would he choose your proposed suicide method? It’s a more rational choice but like you’ve said this isn’t a decision being made rationally.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The same reason that people like him choose methods that can fail by being inturrupted, by failure of method, or by possibility of permanent disability/disfigurement rather than death.

      Certainty.

      The offer of going to an office with a guarantee of an end would stop the vast majority of other methods where one must overcome that lack of certainty to make the attempt. Even a gunshot to the head can and does fail, leaving matters significantly worse for the individual.

      I’m not saying it would stop everyone, but it would stop a great many of desperate people from buying guns or running into traffic while in a bad place and potentially using it on someone they feel is the cause before themselves, or situations like this.

      Some people want to go out loud, but that isn’t the norm. The goal is usually just going out with a minimum of suffering, with the loudness of the act being a symptom of the person’s opportunities for attempts, ie what they can and cannot access.

      • systemglitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I was suicidal many long years ago I researched suicide success rates and gunshot to the head only had about a 90% success rate.

        That was way too low for me to feel comfortable with it.