• livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    @rivermonster most of them are not vocal about it right now. Many of them have normalised relations with Israel in the last few years.

    They also hold the belief that allowing Israel to chase all the Palestinians out of Palestine and grab the land would be the end of the Two State Solution, turning the latter into permanent refugees.

    In practical terms given Israel’s blockades the only country in a position to take them is Egypt.

    • Egypt already hosts 9 million refugees, taking another 2 million would be politically unpopular with voters.

    • Egypt is also afraid of ending up in a border war with Israel (which would happen if any of the new refugees attacked Israel).

    • Egypt also wants the Two State Solution

    Here is an article that might interest you: Why Egypt Won’t Open The Border To Its Palestinian Neighbours

    • rivermonster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Other nations absolutely could petition to take them in and should. They could, at the very least, petioon Israel to allow them to provide refuge, but they dont bc they like things the way they are. I understand why, including it being politically advantageous for all of them and unstable governments, and nobody wants the terrorists hiding among the civilians.

      That’s rather rhe point, Israel can’t commit its war crimes without the assistance of Egypt, and honestly the all the other Arab nations who clutch their pearls. It’s so upsetting to see so many horrible and disingenuous actors in this from the Bibi/Hamas alliance (and theynare bed fellows) to Egypt and the rest of the nations who could help but instead clutch at their pearls and feign outrage.

        • rivermonster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh, I’m with you. Fuck my own country for not taking them in. I’m in the US. Our southern border is one endless crime against humanity. I literally petition my rep and both senators regularly about violations to our consititon and international law that occur here. It is a source of shame for anyone of conscience who lives here.

          • livus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            @rivermonster yeah that’s getting really bad lately.

            I’m in New Zealand and I want more refugees from everywhere, including Palestine. It’s frustrating.
            Turns out Children of Men is the most prophetic sci fi.

            • rivermonster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel you, I argue for both immigration and asylum to be opened and increased in the US. I regularly am so depressed and dismayed that we aren’t even honoring international agreements and law around asylum for those fleeing innumerable horrors.

              I’m very ashamed of my country on this issue.

              • livus@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                @rivermonster to be fair to the US it didn’t actually sign the UN convention on refugees that the rest of the West signed. But I still share your frustration.

                I wish we could all work together on this stuff. Instead we have had some shining examples recently of how countries who do take people from warzones get left to take a huge hit, like poor Bangladesh struggling alone to administer Coxs Bazar (the biggest refugee camp in the world, now home to the Rohingya), or the Kurds who bizarrely were left trying to feed and shelter surrendered ISIS fighters from all over the world.

                • rivermonster@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Honestly, my friend, that is just another source of shame that we aren’t signatories. The same as with our failure to sign on to the ICC. Just know some of us in this craphole are fighting the fascists.

          • Kepabar@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Realistically a governments first responsibility before anything else is the physical safety of it’s citizenship.

            If you know a percentage of a population are religious extremists which will never integrate into your society and will probably pose a risk, then how can you, as a government, take them in?

            It’s a hard sell any way you slice it.

            • rivermonster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              AND refugees camps are awful. The Syrian refugee camp is a nightmare and forgotten by the world atm. But it should still be an option to seek asylum vs. staying in a wazone. Asylum from life threatening warzone and conditions us a human right.

              I agree with you that there’s terrible challenges get and not trying to sugarcoat it. But right now, it’s simple, the world is failing to make sure those who want out can get out. And it is a crime.

              Giving asylum is also not equal to citizenship.