I detest meta as much as anyone but the idea it’s legally liable for collecting the data you are actively putting onto it’s sites is idiotic.
Journey manual machinist with a novice affinity for evolutionary biology.
I detest meta as much as anyone but the idea it’s legally liable for collecting the data you are actively putting onto it’s sites is idiotic.
“His presidency” is not his cult, and “indications” are not evidence. Roe v. Wade was a Supreme Court ruling, originally and now, not legislation. The fear-mongering lies you mention are not Supreme Court rulings. Having been in the blue collar field for as long as I have, I have known a significant amount of people who you’d say fit his cult, and not one of them supports any of the insane bullshit you’re spewing.
Are you actually this delusional or is it just for the attention?
The irony is palpable
Forgive me for not putting incredible weight behind the “issue” of a LLM gendering inanimate objects incorrectly. Seems like an infinitely larger issue in the language itself than the LLM.
Interesting then that you chose to describe the LLM as sexist and not the programmers, regardless of the fact that you know nothing about them.
deleted by creator
Computers do not have the sentience required to be sexist.
And “gender neutrality” of AI should not make the list
“…the technology’s shortcomings in managing gender neutrality and inclusivity…”
Yes, this is definitely the most important concern we need to have about AI, absolutely nothing else.
Not sure I needed an “expert” so inform me of that, it’s been a blatantly obvious threat with the improvement of deep fakes
This is nothing concerning, at all. People really know very little about the rarity of actually coming into contact with, must less being infected by, tetanus.